Fill the Capillary Tube.
Latex gloves should be sufficient protection.
Close off the tube bore with the tip of the
finger.
This is required immediately after collecting the blood to prevent
gravitational drainage of the sample from the tube. The presence of
fractured or splintered glass on the end of the tube can cause
accidental skin puncture. Latex gloves may not provide sufficient
protection against sharp edges. Direct skin contact with blood is
readily possible. Self-sealing capillary tubes eliminate these
exposures.
Seal the capillary tube.
The procedure is to place the dry end (opposite the sampling end) into
the tray with sealing compound. Volume displacement of the sample, if
overfilled, can cause spillage with subsequent contamination of the
operator's finger. The blood sample simply overflows out the end
opposite the end being sealed. When sealing the tube, applying excessive
finger pressure can easily break the tube at the end or in the middle.
This can happen more frequently when technicians disregard sealing the
tube at a 90 degree angle in favor of a more convenient and widely used
bench-top vertical position. Breakage also occurs when applying normal
pressure into sealants containing voids or impactions of broken glass
particles. In every case, accidental self-inflicted wounds with
potentially infectious blood are possible. Self-sealing capillary tubes
eliminate all these high risk exposures.
Centrifuge the blood-filled capillary tube.
Insufficient or improper collection of sealing material leading to
"Blow-out" (total loss) or leakage (partial loss) of sample. Centrifugal
force expels a portion of, or all of the sample as potentially hazardous
aerosols. The self-sealing capillary tube significantly reduces
"blow-outs" and "leakers".
Reforming clay sealants.
Laboratories use clay-like slabs to seal microhematocrit tubes. These
slabs are often contaminated with previous blood samples and possibly
small fragments of broken glass. In an effort to economize, some
technicians reform the slab using their finger. Direct blood contact
with the skin and/or inoculation by splintered glass is a risk under
these conditions. Clay sealants and associated hazards are eliminated
when using self-sealing capillary tubes.
Sealing the wrong end of the capillary tube.
The standard method requires sealing the dry end of the tube.

This step in the procedure requires direct finger contact with the
blood collection end of the tube. Many technicians fear this step and
attempt to seal the tube on the collection end. In this case, the blood
sandwiches between the sealant and the inner wall of the tube and the
sample easily passes around the sealant plug under centrifugal force.
The blood also acts as a lubricant enhancing the chances that the clay
sealant will migrate out the end of the tube while being centrifuged.
The urgent and unfulfilled need for capillary tubes that will provide
greater safety to the healthcare workers who are required to perform
PCVs by the microhematocrit method, was realized when it became well
known that a physician accidentally inoculated himself with the human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV) while manually sealing a microhematocrit
capillary tube. Although we are not aware of other similar cases, it is
our belief that this incident is not unique. However, several cases of
accidental inoculation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) have been brought to
our attention. OSHA's most recent proposed rules for Occupational
Exposure to Bloodborne Pathogens states "The available evidence
indicates that an exposure, resulting from an injury with a needle or
other sharp object, carries the highest risk of HIV or HBV infection."
We believe that the NCCLS Approved Standard for the "Procedure for
Determining Packed Cell Volume by the Microhematocrit Method" has, is,
and will continue to be, a major cause for accidental transmission of
Hepatitis and most probably HIV.
Considering the increasing spread of bloodborne infections, the
number of PCV microhematocrits performed, and the frequency rate of
blood samples lost due to accidental breakage, "blow-outs" and "leakers",
we believe the process of manually sealing conventional capillary tubes
presents an extremely high risk opportunity for accidental transmission
of bloodborne diseases to healthcare workers. The risk of accidental
inoculation, while manually sealing capillary tubes, can be totally
eliminated with the unique and now available engineering controls - the
self-sealing capillary tube. Additionally, other risks associated with
this procedure, are dramatically reduced.
A recent survey of 50 healthcare institutions (hospitals, blood
banks, plasmapheresis centers and doctor's offices) was conducted to
quantify both the incidence of accidental breakage while manually
sealing capillary tubes, and the lost samples due to "blow-outs" and "leakers".
The average incidence of breakage while sealing was 4% with "blow-outs"
representing 10% of the total of 14% of all samples lost. The ranges
were from 2 to 7% for accidental breakage and 5 to 20% for "blow-outs".
These observations lead us to the following alarming conclusions. Based
on the total annual consumption rate of conventional microhematocrit
capillary tubes, the high risk opportunity for accidental fingersticks
while manually sealing blood filled capillary tubes, is calculated to be
at twelve million (12,000,000) times per year involving over two hundred
thousand (200,000) healthcare workers. Another thirty million
(30,000,000) blood samples are lost due to "blow-outs" while
centrifuging. "Blow-outs" result in repeat collections, hazardous
aerosols, blood contaminated centrifuges and hazardous clean-up.
Our ongoing survey, now totaling over 300 healthcare workers who on a
regular basis perform PCV microhematocrits, reveals that 98% admit to
having at least one (1) accidental fingerstick while manually sealing
blood filled capillary tubes.
The important risks eliminated by self-sealing capillary tubes are:
(1) accidental skin punctures associated with closing off the bore of
blood-filled capillary tubes with the finger, (2) accidental skin
punctures from "snapping tubes" while manually sealing and, (3) the
deplored practice of "re-smoothing" (with the index finger or thumb)
blood-contaminated clay sealing materials often imbedded with glass
slivers which can easily penetrate latex gloves.
Other risks significantly reduced are the incidence of capillary tube
"blow outs" (total loss of samples ), "leakers" (partial loss of
samples) leading to hazardous aerosols, hazardous clean-up of
blood-splattered centrifuges, handling and disposal of waste items such
as: blood-contaminated clay sealants, capillary tubes and cleaning
materials.
The self-sealing capillary tube has been found to be highly reliable
as evidenced by a study conducted at a high volume hospital user in the
Baltimore area. Prior to the self-sealing tube, the hospitals Hematology
Department was experiencing greater than a 3% breakage rate while
manually sealing the tubes and greater than a 20% loss rate of samples
from "blow-outs" and "leakers". The testing was conducted by laboratory
professionals who routinely use the microhematocrit method for PCV
determinations. Since March of 1989, the same professionals have
performed to date, over 61,000 microhematocrit determinations using
self-sealing capillary tubes. First, the results show a 100% reduction
(= total elimination) of the high-risk procedure of manually sealing
capillary tubes. Second, the incidence of samples lost due to
"blow-outs" and/or "leakers" has been less than an impressive 1%, as
compared to greater than 23% losses obtained performing by the Approved
Standard method. It is clear that manual sealing of capillary tubes is
woefully inferior to self-sealing, using self-sealing capillary tubes.
Third, a 96% improvement in reducing other risk factors associated with
occupational transmission of bloodborne pathogens was found. These risk
factors include hazardous aerosolizations of blood created by
"blow-outs" and "leakers" and exposure to blood while cleaning
blood-splattered centrifuges.
Another independent study conducted in January, 1989, by a major
plasmapheresis center experienced only two (2) sample losses out of
1,200 self-sealing tubes evaluated.
We want to note an operation that presents a specific hazard above
and beyond the hazards discussed above associated with the use of the
NCCLS microhematocrit method. This hazard is the practice of plasma
harvesting, prescribed and codified as a standard operating procedure at
plasmapheresis centers. Workers at the donor collection sites at the
plasmapheresis centers routinely perform a refractometric protein
analysis by scoring (filing a scratch) between the packed cells and the
end of the capillary tube containing plasma, followed by breaking the
tube with the hands. The segment containing the plasma is then tapped
onto the glass surface of the refractometer in order to drain the plasma
from the broken capillary tube; hence, the term "plasma harvesting".
Often splintering capillary tubes with consequent direct blood exposure
or even bloody skin punctures and aerosolization of blood, is
practically eliminated when using self-sealing capillary tubes and the
dispenser. The use of the dispenser to directly expel plasma from the
tube is an important additional engineering control for a significant
albeit "less wide" spread encounter with capillary tubes.
Analysis of the economics of the self-sealing capillary tube
discloses that when the overall cost to determine PCVs by the NCCLS
Approved Standard microhematocrit method are calculated, it is found
that the reduction in handling time required to seal the blood-filled
capillary tube offsets the increase cost of the self-sealing capillary
tube relative to the cost of the conventional capillary tube.
Moreover, when accounting is also made for materials, labor, and time
associated with repeat testing needed by "blow-outs", is also clear that
overall costs of using the self-sealing capillary tubes are somewhat
less than using the conventional tube.
We have identified a significant bloodborne hazard previously
overlooked by everyone excepting the healthcare workers themselves, who
determine the Packed Cell Volume by the NCCLS Approved Standard
Microhematocrit Method. However, we are now able to provide a unique
engineering control that greatly reduces bloodborne infection hazards
and at the same time, is user efficient, cost effective, and available.
OSHA can encourage the development of engineering controls by
requiring their use under the proposed standards when they can be
demonstrated to be effective, economical and readily available.
* Federal Register/ Vol. 54, No. 102/P. 23043/Tuesday, May 30, 1989/
Proposed Rules